|










| | Red Flags Rule
-- No Longer Applies to Most Physicians

UPDATED - December 14, 2010
After the FTC postponed enforcement of the Red Flags
Rule seven times, Congress finally acted last week
to exclude almost all physicians from its
requirements. Pending President Obama’s expected
signature, physicians and other health care
providers that only extend credit “for expenses
incidental to a service” they provide to a patient
will not have to worry about the rule.
The rule will still apply to those that “regularly
and in the ordinary course of business” “obtain or
use consumer reports” or “furnish information to
consumer reporting agencies” “in connection with a
credit transaction.” The FTC will also be able to
write rules to include other creditors that the FTC
decides “offer or maintain accounts that are subject
to a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft.”
But it cannot extend to physicians who just bill
patients and their insurance companies after the
appointment.
Physicians should of course still be wary of
circumstances that might indicate a patient is
trying to use someone else’s health insurance or
identity. But most won’t have to answer to the
federal government for it.
The
bill was passed by the Senate on November 30, 2010,
by unanimous consent. The House agreed to it by a
voice vote on December 7. It was presented to the
President for his signature on December 8.
Text of S. 3987, the “Red Flag Program Clarification
Act of 2010” (as passed by Congress) can be found
here:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111s3987enr/pdf/BILLS-111s3987enr.pdf
AMA’s statement, “Congress clarifies red flags rule;
AMA instrumental in outcome”:
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/amawire/2010-december-08-general_news1.shtml
FTC’s statement on Congress’s passage of the Red
Flags clarification law:
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2010/12/redflags.shtm
December 8, 2010
In a voice vote yesterday, the U.S. House of
Representatives passed Senate legislation exempting
physicians from identity theft regulations called
"Red Flag Rules" that organized medicine has
criticized as an unnecessary administrative burden.
The legislation, which awaits the signature of
President Barack Obama, averts enforcement of the
regulations in medical practices that would have
taken effect January 1.
The Red Flag Rules implement portions of the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transactions Act enacted in
2003. Under these rules, financial institutions and
credit-extending businesses such as retailers and
car dealerships must draft formal plans on how they
will look out for warning signs, or red flags, of
identity theft and then deal with any cases they
discover.
The American Medical Association and the American
Osteopathic Association
sued the Federal Trade Commission earlier this
year to spare their members from the regulations.
According to their lawsuit, physicians are already
addressing identity theft concerns under the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
Besides creating needless administrative chores, the
Red Flag Rules would interfere with the
physician–patient relationship by forcing physicians
to take a distrustful approach to new patients and
their identity.
The medical associations also contended that
physicians should not be viewed as creditors in the
same vein as car dealerships simply because they
allow patients to pay their bills after the time of
service. The legislation approved by the House and
Senate reflects this understanding of the term
"creditor" and rewrites the Red Flag Rules to
exclude any business that "advances funds on behalf
of a person for expenses incidental to a service
provided by the creditor to that person."
"We hope that the [Federal Trade Commission] will
now withdraw its assertion that the red flags rule
applies to physicians," American Medical Association
President Cecil Wilson, MD, said in a press release
issued today. For its part, the American Osteopathic
Association stated that "this clarification of the
definition of 'creditors' puts an end to the
regulatory and legal wrangling that has plagued this
important consumer protection since 2008."
SOURCE: MedScape Medical News
Older
outdated information --
May 28, 2010
The following is an
announcement from the FTC regarding the Red Flags Rule:
At
the request of several Members of Congress, the Federal Trade
Commission is further delaying enforcement of the “Red Flags” Rule
through December 31, 2010, while Congress considers
legislation that would affect the scope of entities covered by the
Rule.
In
the interim, FTC staff has continued to provide guidance, both
through materials posted on
the FTC website, and
in speeches and participation in seminars, conferences and other
training events to numerous groups. The FTC also published a
compliance guide for business, and created a template that enables
low risk entities to create an identity theft program with an
easy-to-use online form. The FTC staff also has published
numerous general and industry-specific articles, released a video
explaining the Rule, and continues to respond to inquiries from the
public. To assist further with compliance, FTC staff has worked with
a number of trade associations that have chosen to develop model
policies or specialized guidance for their members.
It is unknown
if the AMA's recently announced lawsuit against the FTC over the
inclusion of physicians in the scope of the rule had any part in the new
delay, but the FTC's announcement comes as a welcome relief to those
physician offices which were unprepared to comply with the Red Flags
requirements. UMA continues to encourage physicians to develop and
incorporate plans to prevent and respond to identity theft in the
medical office.
December 31, 2010 is the current deadline set by the Federal Trade
Commission for enforcement of its Red Flags Rule targeting “creditors,”
which may include physicians. According to the FTC, any physician that
routinely sees patients without getting up-front payment in
full (including billing insurance), must comply with this rule.
In response to
indications that the rule will apply to physician practices, the AMA
successfully persuaded the FTC to delay implementation of the rule until
now. Organized medicine is continuing efforts to persuade the FTC that
physicians are not "creditors," and therefore not subject to the Red
Flags Rule, but so far, the FTC has not budged.
In the mean time,
you need to determine whether the rule applies to you and what you need
to do about it. What’s needed to comply with the rule depends on the
size and nature of your practice. In general, “creditors” will need to
develop and implement written identity theft prevention and detection
programs to protect patients and the office from identity theft.
Here are a couple of new resources to assist
you:
"What you need to know about the Red Flags Rule"
Sample
practice policy
Medical Identity Theft is a growing problem that this rule is attempting to address.
Previous Information:
When it announced the
previous postponement, the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said,
“To assist small businesses and other entities, the Federal Trade Commission staff will redouble its efforts to educate them about compliance with the ‘Red Flags’ Rule and ease compliance by providing additional resources and guidance to clarify whether businesses are covered by the Rule and what they must do to comply.” Previously the FTC postponed the deadline for requiring businesses to develop and implement identity theft prevention programs to May 1, 2009, then to August 1, 2009,
and again to November 1, 2009. Although the AMA and other physician organizations have argued that the "Red Flags Rule" should not apply to physician offices, the FTC continues to assert that physician offices are "creditors" and must comply with the regulations.
If your practice has not begun to develop your identity theft prevention program, hesitate no longer. Begin today to create a written program with policies and procedures for identifying, detecting, and responding to medical identity theft for patient billing accounts and medical records, and re-evaluate the program at least annually.
The Red Flags Rule applies to all "creditors" with "covered accounts." The definition of creditor includes businesses or organizations that regularly defer payment for goods or services, or regularly provide goods or services and bill customers later. Accepting credit cards as a form of payment does not, by itself, make an entity a creditor. Covered accounts include any kind of account you offer your patients that involves or is designed to permit multiple payments or transactions, or for which there is a reasonably foreseeable risk to patients or to the practice from identity theft. Nearly all medical practices fall into these broad definitions.
For additional information about the background and reasoning for the Red Flags Rule, visit the FTC’s Red Flags Web site,
www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule. This site has a 4-step guide for low-risk businesses to create their own program. This guide refers to the FTC’s 17-page Red Flags Rule How-To Guide for Businesses is available at
www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/idtheft/bus23.shtm
For a copy of the complete Red Flags Rule,
click here. (Bureaucratic Excess Warning: 256 pages long)
An excellent, and mercifully brief
Fact Sheet on compliance with the Red Flags Rule has been developed by the American Academy of Dermatology. (Note: this sheet does not have the updated deadline dates.)
The law firm of Kern Augustine Conroy & Schoppmann, P.C. has created an
Identity Theft Prevention Program Template from which a practice might begin to develop their own written compliance document.
The American Medical Association has also developed extensive physician helps on this issue which are available on the
AMA Members Website.
If you have additional questions, feel free to contact UMA General Counsel Mark Brinton, JD, at the UMA office or by emailing
legal@utahmed.org |